On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:00 AM <lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org> wrote: > > From: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> > To: James <pkx1...@runbox.com> > Cc: lilypond-devel <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Subject: Re: problem with predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly? > Message-ID: <87woggstw8....@fencepost.gnu.org> > Content-Type: text/plain > > James <pkx1...@runbox.com> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I saw arecent update by a LP user to an 'already-fixed' tracker > > > > <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3290/> > > > > That made it into my inbox thus: > > > > On 06/07/2019 21:54, Christopher Heckman wrote: > >> It's isn't just the website; the boards for augmented and diminished > >> chords are calculated incorrectly. > >> > >> \include "predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly" > >> \new FretBoards \chordmode { b:dim f:aug aes:aug g:dim } > >> > >> The F aug chord is incorrect; it actually shows a G augmented > >> chord. > > >> In all four cases, the numbers at the bottom do not match up with the > >> diagram. The B dim number should be 2343, the A flat aug 032110, and > >> G dim should be 3131. > > This is just a misunderstanding of the numbers: they are not fret > numbers but fingering numbers.
Yes, that's a mistake on my part. However, the G+ chord still doesn't display correctly. > It is a bit unusual that they are > present by default: typically players are expected to figure them out on > their own, and sometimes they are just inscribed in the dots. > > f:aug is clearly wrong, aes:aug has the right notes but the root note is > awkward, not being the lowest. I have no idea how guitarists would feel > about that. My guess is: not too good. The C aug, E aug, and G# aug all have the same notes, so it's vital to have the correct root. --- Christopher Heckman _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
