Hello, On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:48:51 +0100, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: > > >>> I'm going to run `scripts/build/grand-replace' to update all > >>> copyright years. However, my test run shows that there are a bunch > >>> of files that aren't covered, for example > >>> `lily/part-combine-part-iterator.cc', which has the following > >>> copyright notice: > >>> > >>> Copyright (C) 2015 Daniel Eble <d...@faithful.be> > >>> > >>> Shall this be updated to > >>> > >>> Copyright (C) 2015-2019 Daniel Eble <d...@faithful.be> > >>> > >>> ? Ditto for a bunch of other files... > >> > >> How come they aren't covered? > > > > `grand-replace.py' is very simplistic; it only updates last year's > > copyright year to the current one. > > > > So is it OK to simply update the missing cases? Assuming we are > > running `grand-replace' next year again this would be (in almost all > > cases) a one-time job. > > Generally I'm a bit skeptical regarding those updates where people might > have moved or even passed on, but that does not really hinge upon the > matched or non-matched pattern, so I'd say go ahead. Yes, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission ;) besides if someone 'complains' at least it was done in good faith. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel