Hello,

On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:48:51 +0100, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:

> Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >>> I'm going to run `scripts/build/grand-replace' to update all
> >>> copyright years.  However, my test run shows that there are a bunch
> >>> of files that aren't covered, for example
> >>> `lily/part-combine-part-iterator.cc', which has the following
> >>> copyright notice:
> >>>
> >>>   Copyright (C) 2015 Daniel Eble <d...@faithful.be>
> >>>
> >>> Shall this be updated to
> >>>
> >>>   Copyright (C) 2015-2019 Daniel Eble <d...@faithful.be>
> >>>
> >>> ?  Ditto for a bunch of other files...
> >>
> >> How come they aren't covered?
> >
> > `grand-replace.py' is very simplistic; it only updates last year's
> > copyright year to the current one.
> >
> > So is it OK to simply update the missing cases?  Assuming we are
> > running `grand-replace' next year again this would be (in almost all
> > cases) a one-time job.
> 
> Generally I'm a bit skeptical regarding those updates where people might
> have moved or even passed on, but that does not really hinge upon the
> matched or non-matched pattern, so I'd say go ahead.

Yes, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission ;)

besides if someone 'complains' at least it was done in good faith.

James
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to