On 2018/06/12 10:49:11, Be-3 wrote:
On 2018/06/12 10:05:17, dak wrote: > However, cough cough, all this is an unnecessary complication.
Sorry for
> overlooking this. Just write > > Stencil q = *s; > […]
Just to mention it: How about the definition of ly:stencil-rotate in
lily/stencil-scheme.cc?
There, we should have the exact same problem, shouldn't we?
No. new_s is the return value so the compiler cannot possibly optimize it away. https://codereview.appspot.com/341350043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
