On 2/7/18, 9:05 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 2/7/18, 2:37 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Torsten Hämmerle" <lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu....@gnu.org on behalf of torsten.haemme...@web.de> wrote: > > > If there will probably even be a MIDI playback in the future, we actually > need "real" marks to jump to, not only text markups. > This being said, I'd favour *something containing "mark" and "repeat"*, > because that's what it's all about. > > > If we want to capture semantics properly, I believe we need to recognize that there are three different kinds of marks: > > 1) "jump-from" marks (D.S. al ..., D.C. al ..., To Coda) > 2) "jump-to" marks (Segno, beginning of piece, coda) > 3) "stop playing" marks (Fine, end of piece) \playMark ? Do you think we could adequately capture the semantics of all three kinds of marks in a single \playMark command? How would you identify if a given \playMark command establish a jump-from, jump-to, or stop point? By having different commands I intended we would have different events, which could respond appropriately with iterators when doing unfolded playback. If there's another way to do that, I'd be happy to have a single command, but I think I prefer \flowMark to \playMark, because it is more specific about the intent of the mark. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel