2018-02-06 13:17 GMT+01:00 James Lowe <james.l...@runbox.com>:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:36:51 +0100, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still trying to get make doc work again for my guilev2 setup.
>> It now fails at a point I'm not able to surely track down.
>>
>> The only suspicious in the log I'm pointed to is:
>>
>> Processing `./15/lily-ef5769c9.ly'
>
> ...
>
>>
>> Does a simple "programming error" abort make doc?
>
> Are you doing a make doc or a make check?

`make' and `make doc'
>
> Anyway - nothing to do with this thread really but for information - a make 
> check (which runs the reg tests after a 'make test-basline') does not abort 
> with a 'simple' programming error - you can find many times where I have said 
> that a reg test has failed by showing the reg test output itself with that 
> error in it, and this requires the make check to complete in the first place, 
> i.e. to create the file that displays error that I report!
>
> Also a make doc will not abort just on a programming error (you can find a 
> few trackers I have created where some of the MIDI or XML files in the repo 
> always generate a programming error during the make doc process) but again it 
> depends on the context I guess, some programming errors are 'more badder' 
> than others.

Thanks for clarifying, I wasn't sure about those simple `programming error's

Out of my experience with the above quoted
`modifying-the-ottava-spanner-slope.ly', I had some thoughts about
custom-grob-properties, not related to the topic of this thread.
So I'll open a new one.

Thanks,
  Harm

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to