As I don’t really know what I’m doing here, please have a closer look …
https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps File ps/encodingdefs.ps (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode721 ps/encodingdefs.ps:721: /.notdef /.notdef /.notdef /.notdef /.notdef Should one remove one of these /.notdef entries to compensate the addition of /n in line 679? https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode722 ps/encodingdefs.ps:722: % 0xf6 Of course this comment should be adjusted if none of the entries is removed. https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode860 ps/encodingdefs.ps:860: /nine {<7c> show} def I assume that all entries in this block are sorted alphabetically so /n has to get index 7b and all following have to be shifted, right? https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/diff/80001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode863 ps/encodingdefs.ps:863: % 0x78 What’s this? These comments look as if they refer to indexes but they are offset … https://codereview.appspot.com/339090043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
