On 2017/10/24 08:34:13, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I tried to make both engravers as equal as I could, to make it easy
for a follow
up to create a common base class for both. My own naive attempts to introduce something like 'semi-tie-event'
failed,
though.
This looks really similar. I worked off the current definition of Laissez_vibrer_engraver and created a derived Repeat_tie_engraver in a separate issue: Tracker issue: 5220 (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5220/) Rietveld issue: 332990043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/332990043) Issue description: Issue 5220/3: Derive Repeat_tie_engraver from Laissez_vibrer_engraver Issue 5220/2: Virtualize some parts of Laissez_vibrer_engraver This is in preparation of using it for Repeat_Tie_engraver Issue 5220/1: Create laissez-vibrer-engraver.hh Still missing regtest/doc. If you want to replace the lv_column_ and similar elements with semi_tie_column_ for better generality/readability, make this a followup patch. https://codereview.appspot.com/335910043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
