On 2017/08/01 17:49:47, lemzwerg wrote:
> I looked into the latest Harfbuzz internals, and it looks like > the list of supported OpenType features is manually maintained.
Nope.
> Not all the features listed on the Microsoft feature registry > are supported, but many are.
HarfBuzz is agnostic to most features; if you select a feature, and
the feature
is available, and the other feature constraints are met, it simply
gets applied.
> This list [in HarfBuzz] covers pretty much all likely candidates > a user is going to encounter or want to use in modern fonts, so it > probably isn't worth listing each of the supported features.
You are mistaken. What you are referring to is a special interface to
OS X's
`coretext' implementation of OpenType.
I very much appreciate your insight and correction. So, there's no reason to provide or point to a separate list other than the Microsoft registry? https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
