2017-03-12 16:03 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>: > > > Am 12. März 2017 15:52:27 MEZ schrieb Thomas Morley > <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >>Hi all, >> >>guile 2.1.8 is released, which will be the next step towards the new >>stable guile 2.2. >> >>Hence I'd think I should share my test-results >>I've successfully build guile-2.1.8 from the guile-repo and had a >>successful make and a full make doc on the lily-repo. >>I made a regtest-comparison to a build with guile-1.8.8: no >>differences. >>How lilypond with guile-2.18 behaves with respect to the known >>problems (speed, etc) I have to check further, though I expect not a >>real improvement, since I didn't notice any guile-patches concerning >>lily-problems (I may be wrong here, though, further testings will show >>it). > > I'm pretty incompetent here, but may I (re-)raise the question if it would be > a good idea to have the Scheme files in LilyPond in the compiled form? This > should give *default* LilyPond a speed boost and only negatively affect > *users'* Scheme code. > > Urs
On this topic (and others) see David's post here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-02/msg00193.html Though I've to say I'm pretty incompetent here as well. The guile2 manual says nothing about how to do so, afaict. Paul's nice post here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-03/msg00117.html is not yet replied. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
