Antonio Ospite <a...@ao2.it> writes: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:59:54 +0100 > Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > >> Am 10.03.2017 um 09:51 schrieb David Kastrup: >> > Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: >> > >> >> Just wanted to add to the list that I see that the upcoming Ubuntu >> >> 17.04 will not have Guile 1.8 anymore. >> > Then it either will not have LilyPond anymore, have LilyPond with a >> > private compilation of Guile-1.8 included (unlikely since mostly >> > pointless), or have an utterly unusable version of LilyPond that will >> > give us a bad rap. >> >> Hm, then this is actually strange: >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/lilypond >> >> Doesn't state Guile as a dependeny at all ... >> > > Debian unstable has a lilypond package which uses a private copy of > guile-1.8, check the changelog (2.18.2-5 and following): > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.18.2-7_changelog > > That's what the ubuntu package is based on.
Since we don't need the command line executable, this is a viable move (assuming that there are no other Guile-1.8 users, of course. TeXmacs?). In particular since the libguile libraries were without multilib support last time round and probably nobody would have wanted to bother with that. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
