On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Noeck [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n200797...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> 1. Nathan was coding this, I just included this into oll and wrote the > post. Correct. > 2. I guess it still works. > Yep. Mostly without problems, but it does have its limitations. > 3. IIUC, this was just a set of overrides and callback functions picking > up the correct symbols from a smufl font, doing the mapping by glyph > name. So pretty much all you could do without touching lilypond directly. > I guess for the GSoC the approach would be quite different and I hope > Abraham can point into the right direction. > Personally, I think there's not much more that can be done with what is already in OLL, but I don't think that's what we want done anyway. Full SMuFL integration would be a more substantial improvement, IMHO. Best, Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/GSoC-2017-tp200631p200799.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
