Am 22.02.2017 um 20:04 schrieb gra...@percival-music.ca: > Sorry, I disagree. I think the boxes make it easier to skim the page; > there horizontal gap makes it absolutely clear that each proposal is > distinct.
I think the point in Paul's suggestion is to make a clear separation between the project ideas and the last box with general information. If that could be achieved somehow else, e.g. with nested boxes instead of a box with headings in it, I'd be happy too. But I think *something* should be changed, and I also think Paul's suggestion is pretty good to do the job. So what we'd need is an *alternative* suggestion. BUT: Today came an emergency message on GNU's GSoC list that they've been notified by Google to provide more and generally more verbosely described project suggestions. By tonight. Otherwise they might (or would probably) not get accepted! I think we (LilyPond) have done our job very well and it's not our fault, but I wanted to let you know that it's not as obvious as we thought that we'll be able to participate at all this year! Best Urs > > I have no opinion about using bold vs. italics for the "difficulty", > "requirements", etc. parts, though. > > https://codereview.appspot.com/314530043/ > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- u...@openlilylib.org https://openlilylib.org http://lilypondblog.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
