I've posted an extensive rewrite which hopefully addresses all the concerns. I think the result is a lot more user-friendly.
Note that I did not change the argument-name "offsets". My preference would be to use "displacements" here, because I think it is exactly expressive of its use. The documentation of \shape in the NR uses displacements. In second place would be "offsets." (Interestingly, the listing of "shape" in Available Music Functions uses "offsets," in contrast with the NR documentation. I suppose I'm responsible for the function docstring. IIRC, Trevor wrote the \shape documentation.) I've left it as-is for the moment, to invite other opinions. https://codereview.appspot.com/319150043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
