Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> writes:
> Hi David!
>> Uh what?
>>
>> If you want to change the dimensions of a stencil copy, you can just do
>>
>> Stencil wd0 = orig;
>> wd0.set_empty (false);
>
> I use the following code to emit hyphens (stencil ds) and whiteout boxes
> (stencil ws)
> in lyric-hyphen.cc:
>
> Stencil total;
> for (int i = 0; i < hyphens; i++)
> { // ok
> Stencil ds = dash_stencil;
> ds.translate_axis (span_points[LEFT] + start_space +
> i * (dash_period + dash_length), X_AXIS);
> total.add_stencil (ds);
> if (whiteout > 0.0 )
> {
> Box wb (Interval (0, dash_length + 2 * whiteout * lt),
> Interval (h - whiteout * lt, h + th + whiteout * lt));
> Stencil ws (Lookup::round_filled_box (wb, 0.8 * lt));
> ws = ws.in_color (1.0, 0.0, 0.0);
> ws.translate_axis (span_points[LEFT] + start_space + i *
> (dash_period
> + dash_length) - whiteout * lt, X_AXIS);
> ws.set_empty(false); // <== Does not help against collision
> detection
> total.add_stencil (ws);
> }
> }
>
> As you can see in the attached jpgs, a collision of the whiteout box moves
> the last lyric line down.
> set_empty(true) nor anything else I tried does change anything.
Uh, you set the dimensions to 0,0 _after_ moving the thing to its place.
That would make the remaining point stick out seriously wide of the
actual glyph. Maybe move the set_empty before the translate_axis?
> The ugly hack to define a markup property containing a filled box inside a
> \with-dimensions zero
> for both axes, interpret, scale and move the stencil as required
> works. But there must be a better way ...
Your markup example does _not_ include any shift before zeroing the
bounding boxes of the whiteout rectangle. So it would appear like you
don't actually do the same thing here.
> WithUglyHack.jpg shows the targeted result ...
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
