Am 16. Dezember 2016 15:11:59 MEZ, schrieb David Nalesnik
<david.nales...@gmail.com>:
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Knut Petersen
><knut_peter...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Am 16.12.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Urs Liska:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As your knowledge of scheme seems to be well developed, could you
>give
>>>> a scheme equivalent of
>>>>
>>>> forceExtender = { \once \override LyricExtender.force-extender =
>##t }
>>>>
>>>> that is acceptable to lilypond?
>>>
>>> #(once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t))
>>>
>>> (untested)
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the quick answer. If I put
>>
>> (define-public (forceExtender)
>> (once (overrideProperty '(LyricExtender force-extender) #t)))
>>
>> into scm/music-functions.scm, lilypond does know \forceExtender ...
>but it
>> complains about a "non-music expression"
>> if it is used ...
Ah, this one. You explicitly have to create a music function. Maybe
https://scheme-book.ursliska.de/scheme/music-function-primer.html
helps you?
But you can say
(define forceExtender
(define-musi-function ...
HTH
Urs
>
>
>If you are defining a music function, do it in
>ly/music-functions-init.ly,
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
