On 2016-12-14 23:13, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
Worth an entry in changes?
Maybe. Doesn't need a lot, I guess; something like
"Accidental rules can now be defined across ChoirStaff contexts. Two new
rules choral and choral-cautionary are available that combine the
characteristics of modern-voice and piano or their equivalents with
cautionary accidentals."
Some wording-nitpicks, otherwise
LGTM
Thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2210
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:2210: style. It is intended for
editions that are used both by singers that only
The wording feels not very elegant.
Though, I'm a non-native speaker...
Not a native speaker here, either, so I'm open to proposals.
https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm#newcode1847
scm/music-functions.scm:1847: ;; that the first alteration within a
voice (as opposed to on the
wording again, maybe:
Similar to piano, except that the first alteration within a voice is
always printed (as opposed to within a staff).
Agreed, that sounds better.
Cheers,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
