Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > Hi Harm, > > thanks for the patch. > > As for the user-interface, I’d prefer something like > > \unfoldRepeats tremolo \m > \unfoldRepeats volta,tremolo \m > > IIUC, that would require using predicate symbol-or-symbol-list? for > the optional argument.
I don't think so: LilyPond will try a symbol list when a symbol doesn't work. However, people might get surprised by #(unfoldRepeats 'tremolo m) not working. So it's probably less surprising to use symbol-or-symbol-list? overall. > (I hope that works… didn’t test TBH) Also, I think we shouldn’t > require the user to give the technical names for the music types, but > just the term as used with \repeat. As a user interface, that sounds very much desirable. I don't like converting symbols to strings, putting stuff on them, and converting them back again. But it's probably the lesser evil. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
