On 2016/08/16 16:21:26, dak wrote:
At any rate, our evaluations are not all that different and you are the one who actually tried working with the code so I lean towards trusting your judgment. I just hope that we don't get hit by use cases which will again not yield to this code while it might have been approachable by what _looks_ like a somewhat more general scheme. I really don't have much more than a gut feeling to work with here.
Perhaps I should advertise on the user list for some more potential use cases for this. That could yield some situations that I can ensure are satisfied before finalising this. https://codereview.appspot.com/308910043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
