Am 10.08.2016 um 19:09 schrieb David Kastrup: > C++ is a good career move, but the C++ in LilyPond's code base is of > rather mixed quality and of rather mixed age: the early parts had to > rely on the features available in early language standards. So C++ > skills acquired while working with LilyPond may be only moderately > representative for the language as such.
You can also translate this to: "Learning C++ is a good idea. But you shouldn't learn it through LilyPond but rather just learn it (somehow) and *then* adapt your general knowledge when you want to contribute to LilyPond." _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
