Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: >> On Jun 6, 2016, at 16:52 , David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: >> >>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 08:39 , David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: >>>> >>>>> Also, I submitted a couple patches that do not appear in your list. >>>>> Did I miss a step somewhere? >>>>> >>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/2232/ >>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3945/ >>>> >>>> Status "Started" rather than "Accepted". Changed that right now. >>> >>> Thanks. Is there a good reason not to let the git-cl upload script >>> set the status to Started? >> >> git-cl already does that. > > It didn’t for these two issues.
Maybe that happens (not) when uploading to an already existing issue? For newly created issues at least I did not have problems. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
