On 03.03.2016 00:19, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Simon Albrecht wrote Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:52 PM
>I noticed that there have been many ‘Issues to verify’ around, so I
>started to catch up with these. Now the question is: Shouldn’t we only
>mark issues as verified, when the change is already included in an
>official release?
Yes, that is correct. See Regular Maintenance under
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/bug-squad-checklists
Verified fixes should be in an available release.
>For curiosity, following the CG instruction I took the committish from
><https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4754/> – claimed to be
>‘Fixed_2_19_38’ – and fed it into<http://philholmes.net/lilypond/git/>,
>and it worked. So according to the instruction, I should mark the issue
>verified, although the change is not contained in the most recent
>release, 2.19.37.
Which instruction is this? I think Phil's tool finds any commit that is in
the git master, not just those in built releases.
Instruction from the very same page that you link above. That’s why I asked.
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
