> On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:28 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: > >> Good points. When we get to Guile 2.0 then the readability concern >> can be addressed by using ##true and ##false, > > Actually, not sure whether this would be just 2.1. But then moving from > 2.0 to 2.2 should be less of a hassle than 1.8 to 2.0.
Hmmm… yeah, looks like this was committed in January 2014 http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commit;h=7a329029cf898fc0b9b24252c9bb437e1ad0b1d7 and I can’t tell whether it will make it into the 2.0 release series or not. In any case it will be nice to get to 2.2 since it will have a faster interpreter. Although you’re right that the compilation times will be much slower. > At least we can now write x.y.z.w instead of x.y #'(z w) and similar. > That was more of a visual distraction in my book... So I'm not purely > conservative. Yes, these were very nice simplifications, and without requiring any trade offs. Thanks again for all your work, -Paul _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
