Addressing Harm's suggestions in patch set 2.

https://codereview.appspot.com/284980043/diff/1/scm/stencil.scm
File scm/stencil.scm (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/284980043/diff/1/scm/stencil.scm#newcode804
scm/stencil.scm:804: (define*-public (stencil-whiteout stil #:optional
(style 'box)
On 2016/01/03 23:14:22, thomasmorley651 wrote:
I like it optional.
But why do you give default-values for style and thickness? If you'd
do:
  #:optional style thickness (line-thickness 0.1)
then style and thickness default to #f, would be sufficient.

Good point!  I'll make that change.

Though the doc-string needs to be changed then, maybe something at the
lines of:

[...]

Please check spelling, grammar and wording, though. I'm not a native
speaker

Will do, and thanks for the text suggestions.  See how you like the
version in patch set 2.

https://codereview.appspot.com/284980043/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to