Am 20.11.2015 um 10:38 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
> To: "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>; "James" <p...@gnu.org>;
> "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net>
> Cc: "lilypond-devel" <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:59 PM
> Subject: Re: SubdivideBeam gives undesired result when beaming over
> more thana quarter note
>
>
>>
>>
>> Am 20.11.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>>> Urs Liska wrote Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:20 PM
>>>
>>>> However, I have a question: Where are the CLI messages defined that
>>>> are
>>>> used in the git-cl process? This is still talking about Google issue
>>>> tracker items.
>>> Good point. That was why I thought you might not have updated git-cl.
>>>
>>> Copying to Phil, as he is the expert on the new git-cl.
>>>
>>> Trevor
>>
>> Adding a patch set to the existing issue looks right:
>>
>> ~/git/lilypond/source$ git cl upload master
>> input/regression/beam-subdivide-quarter-notes.ly | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> lily/beaming-pattern.cc | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> This branch is associated with Rietveld issue 278060043. Adding patch to
>> that issue.
>> Message describing this patch set: Add regression test
>> Upload server: codereview.appspot.com (change with -s/--server)
>> Your browser has been opened to visit:
>>
>> https://codereview.appspot.com/get-access-token?port=8001
>>
>> If your browser is on a different machine then exit and re-run
>> upload.py with the command-line parameter
>>
>> --no_oauth2_webbrowser
>>
>> Issue updated. URL: http://codereview.appspot.com/278060043
>> Uploading base file for input/regression/beam-subdivide-quarter-notes.ly
>> This has been identified with issue 4664.
>> Is this correct? [y/n (y)]
>> Ticket
>> https://sourceforge.net/rest/p/testlilyissues/issues/_discuss/thread/89d3c5ef/9ca2/
>>
>> updated
>> Tracker issue done: 4664
>>
>> The mentions of the Google tracker appear when creating a new issue.
>>
>> Urs
>
>
> Sorry - in the text above, I see no mention of Google. Where is it
> incorrectly mentioned?
Sorry for me, the text above shows the correct run-through of updating
an existing patch. The original transcript is
~/git/lilypond/source$ git-cl upload master
lily/beaming-pattern.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Upload server: codereview.appspot.com (change with -s/--server)
Your browser has been opened to visit:
https://codereview.appspot.com/get-access-token?port=8001
If your browser is on a different machine then exit and re-run
upload.py with the command-line parameter
--no_oauth2_webbrowser
Issue created. URL: http://codereview.appspot.com/278060043
Uploading base file for lily/beaming-pattern.cc
This has been identified with issue 4355.
Is this correct? [y/n (y)]n
4355 will not be used as a google tracker number.
Please enter a valid google tracker issue number
(or enter nothing to create a new issue):
Command "git config allura.token" failed.
The last line can be ignored because that was then resolved with my
Allura account.
And the lines about issue 4355 can be ignored too, they result from the
commit message referring to another issue.
Urs
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
