Phil,
On October 2, 2015 12:09:35 PM GMT+01:00, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: >I know this has been briefly discussed before, and the conclusion then >was >to wait until we have a Savannah-hosted tracker before updating the CG >to >document the use of the Allura tracker. However, Savannah hosting >could >be anytime or no time, so it seems to me that initial updates to point >to >the current Allura tracker are warranted. Further updates will be >needed >once git-cl and Patchy are working with Allura, but it seems to me >silly >to leave known outdated information in the CG. Anyone oppose updating >it? > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-devel mailing list >lilypond-devel@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel I've been thinking the same thing and have been working on a patch that updates the information about the Patch review process that is currently in the CG. It needs some editing down - initially I brain dump then pare it back bit by bit - and I was going to include Allura in that or at least reference it. James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
