https://codereview.appspot.com/265260043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly
File ly/music-functions-init.ly (left):

https://codereview.appspot.com/265260043/diff/1/ly/music-functions-init.ly#oldcode1265
ly/music-functions-init.ly:1265: #(define-music-function (chord-range
part1 part2)
No, just no.  Putting some new Scheme type without any LilyPond
representation into a user command interface is not the way to go.
There is nothing here that you could not express using a context mod.

https://codereview.appspot.com/265260043/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to