Am 27.08.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Phil Holmes:
Agreed. We had a grand regtest rating project about 3 years ago, and
my comment was that "I don`t see a broken crescendo.". However, it
was so hard to make general improvements to the regtests that I did
not follow most up any further.
I'm assuming you could add this as an issue, but not follow up with a
fix to git?
Yes. I’ve yet to follow up with that bit of knowledge…
But I’ll create an issue on bug-lilypond.
Thanks, Simon
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Albrecht"
<simon.albre...@mail.de>
To: "ly-devel" <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:11 PM
Subject: Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly"
Hello,
forgive if this should be an unnecessary question, but: does this
regtest do what it should?
The description says:
\header{
texidoc = "Broken crescendi should be open on one side."
}
but the code reads
\relative {
c''1 \< \break c1\! \> \break c1\!
}
so each hairpin actually ends before line break and there are no broken
hairpins IIUC.
It’s somewhat self-contradictory here: To match the regtest title, I’d
use some code like
\relative {
c''1 \< \break
c
c\> \break
c
c\!
}
(output attached)
– but, quite correctly, the ‘inner’ broken parts are open to both sides.
So, whatever this regtest was designed for, either it needs a clearer
description or different code.
Best regards, Simon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
