On 8/26/2015 2:50 PM, Wols Lists [via Lilypond] wrote: > On 26/08/15 21:42, Abraham Lee wrote: > > Why is that? I see no reason that text in this context *must* be italic > > by default (and I know it can be changed back). Can someone help me > > understand the logic there? > > > Because, in pretty much every score I know, dynamics text is always > italic?
While this is true (and I understand that historically it really was from an italic text font), nowadays we don't usually use characters from any text font for the most common dynamic text (mp, f, pp, sffz, etc.). They usually exist as dedicated glyphs that have no "font-shape", italic or otherwise. They just are what they are. This \override forces any \markup text to automatically default to italic, which is okay, but doesn't seem that desirable IMO. This isn't a huge deal. I was just curious. It looks like its been this way from the conception of the Dynamics context. - Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/TextScript-automatically-italic-in-Dynamics-context-tp180222p180224.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
