On 2015/08/09 20:47:33, ht wrote:
the [articulate.ly] script's output doesn't contain any
articulations [which would be then processed again by
the new functionality]."
This fact relates directly to my question. It is good that there will
be no double-action when articulate.ly is used (so I'm not objecting to
your patch) but I still think it would be nicer for the script to pass
supported articulations to the lower layer so that there is only one
thing responsible for rendering a particular articulation.
--
Dan
https://codereview.appspot.com/260040043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
