https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/diff/1/lily/grob.cc File lily/grob.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/diff/1/lily/grob.cc#newcode232 lily/grob.cc:232: /* This version of get_system is more reliable than get_system () On 2015/07/23 05:50:38, Keith wrote:
What do you mean by "get_system is more reliable than get_system ()" ?
Actually, what did the original author mean by "more reliable than this->get_system ()"? I can perfectly well write "me->get_system ()" to call the non-static member function get_system (). I don't need a this-pointer to call it, even though whatever pointer I call it through then becomes the this-pointer _inside_ of the function. To preserve meaning, there must be some to start with. https://codereview.appspot.com/258870043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
