https://codereview.appspot.com/244840043/diff/80001/lily/include/fluid.hh File lily/include/fluid.hh (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/244840043/diff/80001/lily/include/fluid.hh#newcode24 lily/include/fluid.hh:24: On 2015/06/07 22:16:00, Keith wrote:
"storage of Scheme fluids" so that people know you mean the
Lisp/Scheme concept
and not the normal meaning of 'fluid'.
Probably rather "GUILE fluids" since Scheme in general does not have them. Scheme srfi-39 provides "parameters" which are somewhat similar. https://codereview.appspot.com/244840043/diff/80001/lily/include/fluid.hh#newcode44 lily/include/fluid.hh:44: SCM value_; On 2015/06/07 22:16:02, Keith wrote:
// the cache
If that comment would clarify matters, it would seem like I should be calling the field "cache_" in the first place. Is fluid_/cache_ better than fluid_/value_? I think the latter captures the distinction between container and content better. https://codereview.appspot.com/244840043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
