David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > lilypond-lfe9kunurqglq9buahr...@public.gmane.org writes: > >> Updates: >> Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push >> >> Comment #23 on issue 4365 by >> pkx1...-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org: Patch: non-member >> is_smob<>(), is_derived_smob<>(), etc. >> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4365 >> >> Patch counted down - please push > > Dan, how do you like it? I think that issue 4400 makes this issue here > a bit nicer but if I commit first, you get the rebase work dropped in > your lap. Is that ok?
Ugh. I just did a tentative rebase of the patch, and it would appear that the Protected_scm patches I already pushed are more of a nuisance with regard to rebasing than issue 4400 anyway. So it seems somewhat pointless not to go forward with issue 4400 (resolving the issue 4400 conflicts seems straightforward as the conflicting sections no longer need any kind of unsmob). -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
