Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > However, there's one more thing to consider here, particularly with > the recent experiences wrt .ly compilation failures, is if there's a > significant difference between binary releases and custom builds. From > the above only 2.19.20 is self-compiled. But a self-compiled modified > 2.19.16 also takes only 12 sec. As do modified builds of 2.17.3 and > 2.19.6! Unfortunately my binary release of 2.18.2 is broken ATM. > > So according to my (limited) tests it seems that LilyPond itself isn't > really speeding up. What *is* reducing compilation time seems to be > related to the binary releases only. > Whatever that means ...
We had rather significant updates to the crosscompiling GCC setup in GUB necessitated by my move of the smob infrastructure from macros to C++ templates. Could well be that the newer GCC does make a difference here. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
