On 2015/04/15 06:26:02, Valentin Villenave wrote:
Perhaps you could add a regtest demonstrating this feature (or add a dotted+accidental note to parenthesize.ly)? Just in case it breaks
again in the
future.
Actually, I had a regtest done and had tested it on my machine, but I didn't do my git manipulation properly. Thanks for catching it! https://codereview.appspot.com/230860044/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode909
scm/output-lib.scm:909: (let* ((paren (parentheses-iotem::calc-parenthesis-stencils grob)) Possible typo?
Definitely a typo. Fixed in the next patch. Obviously the regtest doesn't test this function (pure-y-extent). The function may not be necessary any longer, with the new way of handling pure calls. But I don't know enough to make that decision. Thanks! https://codereview.appspot.com/230860044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
