On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
> > James Lowe wrote Saturday, April 04, 2015 9:27 AM > > > > On 04/04/15 08:49, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> If we freeze patches only on countdown state and nothing else I hope not > >> to curb the holiday rush of activity too much. > >> > >> Would people be ok with that? If not, I'll try to compile a shortlist > >> of patches I'd like to see delayed this evening in order to give them > >> proper attention and let the rest pass normally. > > > > What I can do, so as to not put of people submitting patches in the > > meantime, is to continue test/review/countdown and just not go through > > to the push stage until the 8th (Wednesday) review. So things sit on > > 'countdown' until then. > > Thanks James, I agree with doing that. > I agree too. I do have a question on Rietveld that is bugging me concerning my issue -- https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4335 --David _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
