On 2014/09/07 06:20:59, dak wrote:
I don't like it. The maximum range of a variable is an arbitrary
value and this
"loop avoidance" will not do us much good on a 64-bit architecture.
Thanks for pointing that out. I will make the limits template parameters and restrict them to the range of a 32-bit int when used in this method. If someone with more knowledge of the internals can suggest saner limits, I will gladly use them instead.
Or, much preferable, we should catch any such cases where the circular
reference
is established.
I agree that fixing the root cause is the best thing to do. I am not yet familiar enough with this stuff to do that, but this backstop is beneficial. Termination is more user-friendly than endless looping. People tend to get angry when their time is wasted. https://codereview.appspot.com/134600043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
