Dan Eble <[email protected]> writes: > On Aug 18, 2014, at 04:51 , David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "Keith OHara" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Not if there are uses of NullVoice as a completely invisible voice. >>> If NullVoice does not show its own accidentals, alterations on >>> NullVoice notes should not count for figuring which further notes need >>> visible accidentals. >> >> So NullVoice needs its own local accidental style? > > With the accidental styles for vocal music, the accidentals engraved > for one voice depend on what has happened in other voices, so it would > seem a little dissonant to define the style within the voice context.
You are aware that we have several per-voice accidental styles? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
