On 2014/07/17 09:13:54, dak wrote:
mailto:perpeduumimmob...@gmail.com writes:
> That leaves me with only one more question: Is there any reason to
use
> Texinfo markup in those docstrings, given that all more-or-less
obvious
> ways of accessing it do not seem to use it? Or should I rather give
a
> well-formatted uncluttered raw text description for unprocessed
human
> consumption?
Obviously, there is nothing precluding us from eventually including
the
doc strings in the Internals Guide, most likely stripped down to actually exported symbols (the rest, if at all, would rather belong to the Contributor's Guide).
Good point. Thanks! https://codereview.appspot.com/108700043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
