[email protected] wrote: > The stack is scanned automatically in GUILEv1 already. That's > extensively used.
Huh, so it is. I thought the conservative GC was new in Guile 2, but apparently the change was not that dramatic. > For Guile 2.1, it might make sense to enquire on the Guile > developer list what one is supposed to use instead. I asked, and Ludovic Courtès suggested simply implementing our own version of protects. In Guile 2, there's no longer anything special about the built-in protects; it's just a convenience, and it can be recreated in less than a page. Are the memory-leak debugging tools important enough to bother? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
