Am 06.05.2014 11:35, schrieb James:
On 06/05/14 10:05, Urs Liska wrote:
On more question about the process:
Am 06.05.2014 09:55, schrieb James:
3911
<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3911&q=label%3APatch-countdown%20OR%20label%3APatch-waiting%20OR%20label%3APatch-review%20OR%20label%3APatch-new%20OR%20label%3APatch-push&sort=patch&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified>
Enhancement Urs Liska push Patch: Two minor fixes in
existing pondings
I've now pushed that to staging, and this means it will eventually be
merged to master.
Am I right that I should update the label on the issue tracker to
fixed when that has happened? Or can I do that now or will it be done
automatically?
The committer should indicate that the issue has been pushed.
There is no 'standard' other than changing the 'status' field to 'fixed'.
However, some of us have started to put the commit ID of the checkin
into the Tracker and we like to change the Label from Patch-Push to
Fixed_x_y_z where X Y and Z are the build number of the current LP
version in staging.
That way someone can look at the tracker and see at least what version
of LP (stable or otherwise) the fix was introduced.
See
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3905
as an example of what I do.
James
Thanks.
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3911
Best
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
