On 05/05/14 05:42, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 03:50, schrieb Graham Percival:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:02:48PM +0000, lilyli...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Updated patch, now applied to master.
I hope you mean "now applied to staging". You should never push
anything directly to master.
Well, Patchy the autobot complained that the initial patch didn't
apply to master ...
But don't worry, I'm fully aware of the set-up and will of course move
the commit to the current HEAD of _staging_ when time comes to push.
Urs
Patchy compiles *against* master as that is always the benchmark (so to
speak).
If it doesn't compile against master then there is no point checking it
in to staging.
Then when patchy eventually comes to merge the two (staging and master)
and it fails then we still have a working master and only staging is broken.
James
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
