Think it's worth putting this up as an Issue, so as not to lose it. -- Phil Holmes
----- Original Message ----- From: James To: Phil Holmes Cc: Developers List Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:20 PM Subject: Re: Question about the make check tests Hello, On 19 January 2014 11:11, Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "James" <[email protected]> To: "Developers List" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:43 PM Subject: Question about the make check tests Is it worth pursuing? It's not that hard for me to go through each of the .ly files above and find out which reg test it is. But I wanted to check in case these sorts of errors would be expected in the make check phase. James I think it is: it seems to me that we should aim to have all the "make" activities proceed without error. For simple make (especially on 64 bit system) that's probably ambitious. However, I think we should aim for zero errors on make check. Well I went through the 16 .ly files that popped up programming errors in the logs. Of which seven, when compiled directly as a .ly file with current build 2.19.1 of LP didn't show any errors. That left 9 which still did. I have zipped them up and attached them. Each ly file contains the code (obviously) but also the verbose output (cut/pasted from a lilypond --pdf -V command) pasted underneath. I Hope this is useful to someone. James PS just to remind everyone. I simply did a make, make test-baseline and an immediate make check with no changes in between. I also haven't done a convert-ly on these files either (just in case that also needs to be considered).
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
