>> How much sense would it make for there to be a separate \mark-style
>> command that functioned identically but didn't mess with the
>> counter?
I'm all for it!
> Meh… I don’t really like the original suggestion (of a
> RehearsalMark-relative \addAt parameter), so it makes little sense
> to me.
So what will you do with, say, 100 \addAt entries after inserting an
additional bar? If \addAt could be relative to markers, I would only
have to update the \addAt entries between the two markers which
contain the additional bar. Without that, I had to update all \addAt
entries that come after the inserted bar.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
