Urs Liska writes:

> Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?

I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library,
and/or heavy rewiring to make it deeply integrated with a gui, or accept
another native input language like the lilypond-driven fixed fresh
release of MusicXML 4.0; something like that would warrant 3.0.

> I mean 2.0 followed on 1.8, and now we're already towards .20

We had major language changes and a deep incorporation of Guile, those
made good excuses to move away from the 1.0 series.

Jan

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl  

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to