Am 03.01.2014 08:03, schrieb Keith OHara:
Marc Hohl <marc <at> hohlart.de> writes:
I am about to upload a patch for these four glyphs within the next
days, but I wanted to ask whether a new (or enhanced existing)
regtest is necessary for this type of enhancement?
They could conceivably be broken accidentally, by a mistaken change
to our .mf files or a metafont bug, so a regression test is useful.
LilyPond probably has too many tests, but you could add to 'clefs.ly'
Ok, thanks for the tip.
I rearranged clefs.ly so that both normal-sized and smaller clefs
are covered by the regtest, I hope that this is ok.
http://codereview.appspot.com/47840043
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
