James <pkx1...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > I tried to look back on the old discussions when we set up the > Pondings and I am not sure where the tweet/web line should be drawn > (if it should be drawn at all). > > That is the tweet is I assume going to be rather ephemeral whereas the > website is going to be around for a while in terms of being > search-able. So for example David K added a Ponding recently: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=49eb1b3eab84975c67613986c65f60f731c9818b > > Which is great but I see no reason why this would not be better served > in the 'productions' part of the website.
Basically it was to avoid making a more definite decision. It may well be that it belongs in some of the more permanent sections ultimately. I'm trying not to drop too many balls, so I decided to do at least something. > Are there any strong opinions? Well, my strongest opinion is that anything I need not bother with helps me focus on things I am better at. We have some rules due to our being a GNU project: we don't want to advertise non-free software or services based on similar lock-ins. So anything deserves a close look before it is placed in our more permanent sections. Also one should try not having too many dead links... -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel