Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 12.12.2013 16:39, schrieb Paul Morris: >> Urs Liska wrote >>> Am 12.12.2013 14:10, schrieb Mike Solomon: >>>> On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Urs Liska < >>> ul@ >>> > wrote: >>>>> The page "GSoC 2012" is obviously outdated. >>>>> >>>>> What should be done with it? >> What about just changing it to "GSoC" (dropping the "2012") and make it a >> general GSoC page. Assuming we're still interested in attracting future >> "GSoCoders," having this page shows our interest, our past participation, >> and some examples of what future projects might look like. > > Sounds good. > Could be made into sth like: "These are some ideas. Maybe you're > interested in such a project?" > What would be the basic requirement to apply for/participate in a > future GSoC? > >> >> Janek's GSoC work can legitimately be presented in a positive light: "he >> learned a lot, the task turned out to be more involved than was first >> thought, but he is still working on finishing it and is still actively >> contributing to the project in other ways as well" etc. > > If we turn it into a generic GSoC page that's certainly possible.
I'd let the topic of the last GSoC rest until there are more tangible followup results. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
