2013/10/15 <d...@gnu.org>: > On 2013/10/15 18:04:43, janek wrote: > Well, that's the slightly icky thing. The \offset is with respect to > the situation you'll get when doing \revert Arpeggio.positions > afterwards. So if you want to make a _relative_ offset to the first > setting, you have to do > \temporary \offset #'positions #'(-1 . 2) Arpeggio > > I'm not overly enthusiastic about how the \offset command ends up when > entered as an override. Maybe we should allow > \offset #'(-1 . 2) Arpeggio.positions here? It seems that the offset > list should not be confusable with a symbol? or whatever is used in the > front? So we could make that first argument optional, and complain when > the last argument is not a symbol list making up for it?
No idea :-( _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
