On 2013/08/14 12:18:12, janek wrote:
2013/8/14 <d...@gnu.org>:
> I crosschecked with the parser and it would not object to either.
The
> only argument _for_ such a change would be more visual similarity
rather
> than mnemonic value and that rules out -, pretty definitely. One
could
> talk about -' at most. It would be sort of a nuisance to change
that
> including all documentation again but there would be no technical > problem doing that.
Hmm. would there be a technical problem to have /both/ -! and -' as shorthands for staccato?
Technical? Not really except that we'd have to make a choice of convert-ly rule. But I don't think we help anybody by providing two shorthands for one particular articulation. Anybody else with an opinion regarding -! or -' (and of course the corresponding _! ^! _' ^' too) as the shorthand for staccatissimo, replacing the previous -| (which would not work due to technical reasons). https://codereview.appspot.com/12432043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
