On 14 août 2013, at 09:58, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > > > Mike posted three patches to issue 3385 that attempted to go halfway > backwards, partially restoring the pure-relevant? test, but these > ran into regressions. > > Going forward would be to make the pure versions of these functions, > actually work properly before line-breaking, without triggering other > calculations prematurely (i.e., make them acually 'pure').
I think my most recent patch set for 3385 does this. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
